Peter Pentchev
2018-04-20 07:58:46 UTC
I now wondered if it's not only en_GB.utf8 which is "different", but also
the NZ and US variants sort like that (and so differently than C)... not
sure if en_FR.utf8 exist, but using it, it sorts differently / like C ;)
(probably because it doesnt exist, thus the default, C, is used.)
Indeed, it doesn't exist. At least , for fr_* locale, it seems to bethe NZ and US variants sort like that (and so differently than C)... not
sure if en_FR.utf8 exist, but using it, it sorts differently / like C ;)
(probably because it doesnt exist, thus the default, C, is used.)
consistent both in the different charsets available (e.g. fr_FR and
fr_FR.UTF-8) and country (fr_BE, fr_CA, fr_CH, fr_FR and fr_LU).
Actually I thought the localization had been made consistently with the
apparition of unicode locales...
unicode locales"!
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev ***@ringlet.net ***@FreeBSD.org ***@storpool.com
PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115 C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13
Peter Pentchev ***@ringlet.net ***@FreeBSD.org ***@storpool.com
PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115 C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13